Chris:

I know the subject of "when" is pretty much taboo around here, and I
understand why, but this notice is almost a year old.  Would anyone in the
dev group be willing to make an estimate of the status of 3.5 under the
caveat that no one is to hold them to it?   I don't think it's too much to
ask is they think they are 6 months away, a couple months away, a couple
weeks away, any day now, etc.  But if it is, that's OK with me.

Rick



"Chris Huff" <chr### [at] maccom> wrote in message
news:chr### [at] netplexaussieorg...
> In article <3B698214.2C0CFA72@aol.com>, Dave Dunn <poi### [at] aolcom>
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, it seems that there is a profusion of new patched versions of POV
> > and MegaPOV out there, from PVPOV to POVMan to the particle_system patch
> > to the Stochastic Radiosity patch. This is similar to the situation that
> > led up to the incorporation of all those new features into UVPOV a while
> > back. I was wondering if anyone is eyeing a macro-mega patch that will
> > tie all the new features into a single coherent location.
>
> Features in MegaPOV+ usually get added to MegaPOV, exceptions being
> features that are still too much in development, such as the
> particle_system patch. There probably won't be a new version of MegaPOV+
> until the next version of MegaPOV is released.
> MegaPOV itself is pretty much frozen, there are no plans to release
> another version until after POV 3.5 has been released.
> POVMan, the stochastic radiosity patch, and most of the other patches
> that aren't in MegaPOV have been going through heavy development...any
> version included in MegaPOV would soon be obsolete, and they are usually
> based on MegaPOV anyway.
>
> There may be a much more open development model for POV 4.0, read the
> latest status update for details (http://www.povray.org/3.5-status.html).
>
> --
> Christopher James Huff - chr### [at] maccom,
http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
> TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
>
> <><

Post a reply to this message